How Iris supports
regulatory disclosure
Assess at the depth your framework requires
Different disclosure frameworks call for different levels of analysis. Class 0 and Class 1 assessments satisfy most screening and preliminary disclosure requirements. For frameworks that demand scenario analysis, quantified financial impact, or forward-looking projections, Class 2 and Class 3 provide the depth and traceability to meet those thresholds.
Climate scenarios built in
Most hazards in Iris include climate change projections across SSP pathways and IPCC time horizons (present-day, mid-century, end-of-century). Multiple climate models are available. Report under the scenarios your framework requires, whether that's a 1.5°C alignment pathway or a high-emissions baseline.
Quantified financial impact
Disclosure frameworks increasingly require financial quantification of physical risk. Iris produces repair costs, downtime projections, revenue loss estimates, and annualized losses tied to specific hazard scenarios, expressed as probabilistic ranges rather than single-point estimates. These outputs map directly to the financial impact disclosures required by TCFD, CSRD, and SFDR.
Audit-ready methodology
Every Iris output traces back to a published risk assessment framework developed at Arup. The underlying methodology (hazard intensity, component damage, financial consequence) is transparent and fully documented. When auditors or regulators ask how you arrived at your numbers, the chain from hazard data to financial output is traceable end to end.
Standardized exports
Data formatted for compliance reporting. CSV and Excel exports structured to align with TCFD, EU Taxonomy, and SFDR reporting templates.
Climate scenario coverage
Risk results across multiple SSP pathways and time horizons, ready for scenario analysis sections of disclosure reports.
Financial impact metrics
Quantified repair costs, downtime, and revenue loss estimates that map directly to the financial impact requirements of TCFD and CSRD.
Portfolio-level summaries
Aggregated risk metrics across your full portfolio for annual report inclusion and investor presentations.
Methodology documentation
Clear explanation of the assessment methodology, data sources, and assumptions. Designed to stand up to auditor and regulator scrutiny.
Built for the frameworks
you report against
TCFD
Physical risk assessment under multiple climate scenarios, financial impact quantification.
Scenario-based loss estimates across SSP pathways and time horizons. Quantified repair costs, downtime, and revenue impact.
EU Taxonomy
Screening for material physical climate risks, climate projections for assets with 10+ year lifespans.
Multi-hazard screening with forward-looking climate projections at present-day, mid-century, and end-of-century.
SFDR
PAI indicators for physical risk exposure, scenario analysis.
Portfolio-level risk metrics and asset-level PAI-compatible indicators with climate scenario analysis.
CSRD
Double materiality assessment, detailed physical risk quantification.
Asset-level and portfolio-level physical risk quantification with traceable engineering methodology. Supports both financial and impact materiality dimensions.
